|
1. Why
does Turing think that the 'imitation game' is a satisfactory replacement for
the question 'can machines think?' Do you agree? (p. 340)
2.
Do you think that there is anything that a machine can't ever do, even in
principle, but that a human can? What might be possible candidates? (p. 340)
3.
What does Searle think his Chinese Room thought-experiment shows? (p. 353)
4.
Does Searle's thought-experiment allow us to draw any conclusions about the
adequacy of Turing's 'imitation-game,' which is supposed to stand in for the
question 'can machines think?' (p. 353)
|